And that's where one of the complications arises. In the most recent press release from ABN, it appears that not all members of the consortium have lined up financing to complete a deal.
Furthermore, even though Royal Bank of Scotland has included $24.5 billion of the $99 billion total for LaSalle, that contribution is conditional on the purchase of the entire company taking place. The resulting problem for ABN is that it would owe Bank of America a breakup fee if it backed out of the existing deal for LaSalle.
That's why the Dutch ruling is such a big deal. Considering that LaSalle is an important piece of the consortium's bid and that its sale is a requirement for the Barclays deal to close, whichever way the shareholder vote falls on the LaSalle now becomes extremely important.
The Barclays offer to ABN Amro shareholders is a good deal. The consortium's offer is even more attractive on the surface, but with the financing apparently up in the air, spurning the Barclays bid would carry some risk.
Which way the shareholders vote is likely to be further complicated by the wishes of the members of ABN Amro's management. Under the Barclays deal, current ABN executives will retain their jobs. It isn't clear to me that such provisions are in place with the offer from the consortium.
Management points to the uncertainty in financing and other conditions of the consortium's offer as signs that the consortium offer is not superior to the one from Barclays. These are indeed real uncertainties, but shareholders should also consider the other factors that weigh on management's recommendation.
I still think Barclays is a great business, and if I were an ABN Amro shareholder, I'd have no problem with getting Barclays shares. That said, if shareholders can get a higher immediate return from a cash sale of ABN to the consortium and then turn around and purchase Barclays shares in the open market, that's clearly a better deal for the shareholders. It also allows shareholders the flexibility to do what they wish and not be locked into Barclays if they don't wish to be.
Fortunately, the shareholders will get a chance to vote and decide this issue for themselves, regardless of what ABN's management tries to tell them is best.
Bank of America is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. Looking to bank on some quality dividend-payers? Income Investor can help. Try it out free for 30 days.
Nathan Parmelee had no financial interest in any of the companies mentioned. The Motley Fool has an ironclad disclosure policy.
This feature may not be reproduced or distributed electronically, in print or otherwise without the written permission of uclick and Universal Press Syndicate.
